Demotion of Pluto as a planet

[cino hilliard]

Thanks frank,
I did a search for planets, wrote down the list
A070273,A111050,A116448,A118652 on paper
And really blew the simple typing into the email. This was bad, but worse, I 
checked it and still
blew it. Woe is me.

Thanks again.

Cino


>From: franktaw at netscape.net
>To: hillcino368 at hotmail.com, seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
>Subject: Re: Demotion of Pluto as a planet
>Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:45:22 -0400
>
>A110050 does not need any changes; it is a mathematical
>sequence with a historical relationship to the planets.
>
>The last one should be A118652, not A118952.
>
>And, every small integer has enough important properties that any of them 
>will do.
>
>Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cino hilliard <hillcino368 at hotmail.com>
>
>Hi, 
> 
>The celestial object we call Pluto was demoted from its planet status 
>today. 
> 
>Sequences 
> 
>A070273,A11050,A116448,A118952 
> 
>need to be corrected. I was going to comment on these but apparantly my 
>comments are not 
>going through to the database. 
> 
>Too bad about Pluto. Now Mickey Mouse and Goofy will not become astronauts 
>so they can visit Pluto. However, numerically, not all is lost. The number 
>of planets is still a perfect power. 
> 
>Have fun, 
>Cino 
> 
>