COMMENT on A111050. Re: Demotion of Pluto as a planet

[Antti Karttunen]

franktaw at netscape.net wrote:

> A110050 does not need any changes; it is a mathematical
> sequence with a historical relationship to the planets.
>
The sequence is A111050.
And it needs just one change: addition of the keyword "dead",
because it is an erroneous duplicate of A003461. "Bode numbers 
multiplied by 10: 4 + 3*floor(2^(n-1)). "
http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A003461

The link http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A354412
could be transferred from A111050 to A003461, and let's
hope that OEIS can present it properly, without interpreting A354412 as 
an "A-number".
Maybe URL http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/%41354412 works better!

Yours,

Antti



> The last one should be A118652, not A118952.
>
> And, every small integer has enough important properties that any of 
> them will do.
>
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cino hilliard <hillcino368 at hotmail.com>
>
> Hi, 
>  
> The celestial object we call Pluto was demoted from its planet status 
> today. 
>  
> Sequences 
>  
> A070273,A11050,A116448,A118952 
>  
> need to be corrected. I was going to comment on these but apparantly 
> my comments are not 
> going through to the database. 
>  
> Too bad about Pluto. Now Mickey Mouse and Goofy will not become 
> astronauts so they can visit Pluto. However, numerically, not all is 
> lost. The number of planets is still a perfect power. 
>  
> Have fun, 
> Cino 
>  
>
>
>