OEIS on vacation in December
Rob Pratt
Rob.Pratt at sas.com
Tue Dec 5 19:58:09 CET 2006
prime author:"zak seidov"
Returns 1081 sequences
-----Original Message-----
From: zak seidov [mailto:zakseidov at yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:12 PM
To: Rob Pratt; seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
Subject: RE: OEIS on vacation in December
Rob, seqfans!
Most of these 1174 "prime seidov"'s
are not of mine, I beleive.
And even all 25594 "prime" sequences
in OEIS have been submitted by me - what then?
Why have Neil and co-editors ACCEPTED them?
(I repeated some 1,000 times that
one should discriminate between RECEIVED and ACCEPTED submissions).
It is a general policy (and undisputed right) of any editor board to select/reject/accept submissions.
WARD (=with all due respect),
Zak
PS You may call me "prime" offender,
but my salary (which is zero) doesn't depend on the number of "my sequences" appeared in OEIS, and I don't mind if you'll remove all (OK, most of) my submisions from OEIS.
WARD,
Zak
--- Rob Pratt <Rob.Pratt at sas.com> wrote:
> Zak,
>
> You are one of the "prime" offenders. A search on "prime seidov"
> returns 1174 sequences.
>
> Rob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: zak seidov [mailto:zakseidov at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:11 AM
> To: Rob Pratt; seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
> Subject: RE: OEIS on vacation in December
>
>
> --- Rob Pratt <Rob.Pratt at sas.com> wrote:
>
> > Because overzealous contributors have swamped the
> database with
> > sequences that have a contrived relationship to
> prime numbers.
> >
> > Rob Pratt
>
> OK!
>
> But dear Rob, dear Neil, dear co-editors, and dear seqfans!!
>
> Why not simply to reject such "probably not"
> submissions???!!!
>
> I "have swamped the list with this Q"
> and have never got a reasonable explanation....
>
> WADR (=with all duty respect),
> Zak
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Baruchel [mailto:tbaruchel at free.fr]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:19 AM
> > To: seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
> > Subject: Re: OEIS on vacation in December
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, N. J. A. Sloane wrote:
> > > - don't send in sequences that you made up
> (unless
> > > they are really beautiful - and if they
> > > are base dependent or involve primes
> > > they are probably not)
> >
> > Just a question ; I do understand very well why
> base dependent
> > sequences aren't really beautiful, but I sincerely
> wonder why
> > sequences which involve prime numbers "are
> probably not". Why? Aren't
> > they the most beautiful ones?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Baruchel
> >
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list