should I submit?

[Jonathan Post]

" The smallest prime
<http://primes.utm.edu/glossary/page.php/Prime.html>whose cube is
zeroless pandigital (
i.e., containing all digits from 1 to 9).
[Gupta<http://primes.utm.edu/curios/ByOne.php?submitter=Gupta>
]"
http://primes.utm.edu/curios/page.php?short=3793

On 12/19/06, Tanya Khovanova <tanyakh at tanyakhovanova.com> wrote:
>
> Dear seqfans,
>
> While I was working on my Number Gossip page:
> www.numbergossip.com
> I realised that when I am checking a unique property for a number, I might
> as  well calculate the corresponding sequence and submit it if its not
> there. (that's where most of my sequences come from)
>
> I am biased: I find all sequences that start with a number more than 1000
> and do not have parameters in them very interesting. Today is the first time
> I am not sure. Here is a unique property for 1903 I will include in number
> gossip: 1903 is the smallest number, such that its cube is zeroless
> pandigital.
>
> Should I submit the corresponding sequence of numbers that have zeroless
> pandigital cubes:
> 1903, 2257, 2589, 2691, 2842, 2866, 3024, 3159, 3166, 3195, 3598, 3658,
> 3793, 3908, 4335, 4874, 5032, 5224, 5503, 5596, 5703, 5812, 6009, 6023,
> 6259, 6289, 6437, 6486, 6645, 7446, 7497, 7592, 7821, 7846, 7899, 8056,
> 8066, 8166, 8168, 8662, 8677, 8873, 8876, 9165, 9267, 9406, 9463, 9465,
> 9507, 9558, 9579, 9697, 9732, 9781
>
> Tanya
> P.S. BTW, 3793 is the smallest prime that have zeroless pandigital cube
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermail/seqfan/attachments/20061219/14289cf8/attachment-0003.htm>