calculator sequence inspired by my calendar
jos koot
jos.koot at telefonica.net
Thu Dec 21 22:34:15 CET 2006
Hi,
This means that there is an algorithm that decides whether or not a number is the difference between itself and its pocket-calculator upside down.
Thanks, Jos Koot
PS:I did not consider 7 and 1 to mirror. The updside down of 7 looks like 1, but not reversely.
----- Original Message -----
From: franktaw at netscape.net
To: seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: calculator sequence inspired by my calendar
Not the most useful, but it suffices for small values:
If n is a 2k+1 digit number for which f(n) > 0, f(n) >= 10^k.
If n is a 2k digit number for which f(n) > 0, f(n) >= 9*10^(k-1).
(Here f(n) is the reversal of n minus n.)
So to determine if 15 is a possible difference, it suffices to check
through n=999.
---
And yes, the sequence is certainly infinite. If n is a k digit integer
with f(n) defined and positive, then f(10^(k+1)+10n+1) = 10 f(n).
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
-----Original Message-----
From: jos.koot at telefonica.net
Hi,
Indeed, a practical test on all numbers below 1000000 has shown me
that 15 does not occur as such a difference for these numbers. Of
course there is a systematic way (a procedure, not an algorithm) of
forming a sequence of all such differences. Things very much depend on
the order in which you want form this sequence, I think. Furthermore I
think the sequence has unlimited length, but that makes it all the more
interesting. I guess you want a decision algorithm that given any
number can decide whether or not it is the difference between a number
and its upside down (more precisely rotated over 180 degrees) This is
interesting, but I am not sure it is within my capacities. Nevertheless
I intend to look into this problem, but this has to wait a week or so
(Chrismas time you know)
Greetings, Jos Koot
----- Original Message -----
From: Tanya Khovanova
I am looking for the numbers that can be represented as the difference
of a number and its ipside down version on a calculator. I think I can
prove that 15 is not there, but I do not have a systematic way to build
this sequence.
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "jos koot" <jos.koot at telefonica.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:27:15 +0100
>Here are some solutions:
>Greetings, Jos Koot
>mabel 12, zane 21
>mabel 15, zane 51
>mabel 16, zane 91
>mabel 18, zane 81
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermail/seqfan/attachments/20061221/ebbd9b88/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list