lookup suggestion: subsequences

[Max]

N. J. A. Sloane wrote:
> YES, but the ones that preserve your order will appear first, I believe

That's not true. For example, query "1 2 3" gives A000217 as the second hit (this sequence does not contain term 2 at all),
A000142 as the third hit (and this sequence does not contain term 3 at all) and only then A000041 which contains precisely "1,2,3".

Is it a bug or what?

Max