Astronomical ratio, convention for continued fractions
franktaw at netscape.net
franktaw at netscape.net
Wed Jun 7 21:35:23 CEST 2006
For important numbers, Neil likes to have both the decimal expansion
and the continued fraction as separate sequences. On the whole, there
are a lot more decimal expansions in the database than continued
fractions.
In a case like this, where the continued fraction has been published, I
would say definitely add both. Be sure to include the reference.
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Plewe <aplewe at sbcglobal.net>
I was reading about the Antikythera Mechanism at The Register:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/07/antikythera_mechanism/
and while doing further Googling came across this AMS article detailing
a
continued fraction for computing the Astronomical ratio:
http://www.ams.org/featurecolumn/archive/kyth3.html
13.368267.. = [13, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 17, ...]
1
= 13 + ------------------------
1
2+ ---------------------
1
1+ ------------------
1
2+ ---------------
1
1+ ------------
1
1+ --------
1
17+ ----
etc
Anyway, I thought this might be of general interest to the list and
worth
adding to the OEIS if it isn't already in there. Would it be best to
submit
this as a decimal expansion, with the continued fraction listed in the
comments or formula section? I see that the decimal expansion and
continued
fractions are listed as seperate sequences for the constant Pi but I'm
not
sure if people generally hold to this convention. Thanks!
-Andrew Plewe-
___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list