Confused about A000091

[Gene Smith]

This says "Description corrected Mar 02 2004. (The old description defined
A000086 <http://www.research.att.com/%7Enjas/sequences/A000086> not this
sequence.)" However, when I compute A000086 I get this sequence, not
A000091. So either I'm making the same mistake, or the correction is wrong.
Does anyone know about this one?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermail/seqfan/attachments/20060521/a5ff59e7/attachment.htm>