A124080 10 times triangular numbers

[Jonathan Post]

As usual, you're right, Neil.

I was trying to be nice to the newcomer, by showing him the collaborative
nature of the endeavor. I'm sure that his enthusiasm can be made fruitful.
I've certainly erred in judgment, many times, and you and your associate
editors have been splendid in guiding me towards better work.

Sometimes, as they sing: "you've got to be cruel to be kind."

Hence the "probation" keyword and, one of my useful suggestions to you and
your board, the "less" keyword.

Sorry for where that road leads, which I help pave with good intentions.

-- Jonathan

On 11/26/06, N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com> wrote:
>
> JVP, you submitted this sequence:
> %N A000001 Primes of the form A124080 (10 times triangular numbers), +1
> or -1.
> I will use it, but I do not find it interesting.  Why?  Because it
> is derivative.  It is based on a sequence of little interest - acceptable
> only because it was sent in by someone who perhaps does not know
> what is worth being included in the database - and is a step further
> down the ladder towards the basement.
>
> I seem to have to play the role of the singing teacher
> at times:  so be it - this song was off-key!
>
> Neil
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermail/seqfan/attachments/20061126/a24ae511/attachment-0003.htm>