all-base composites

[franktaw at netscape.net]

No,  it really should have the "base" keyword.

If you did the sequence in some other base, you would get a different 
series of *numbers*.

Actually, you would even get a different sequence of *numerals*.  For 
example, in base 2,
you would get the numerals:

100, 110, 1000, 1001, 1010, 1100, 1110, 1111, 10000, 10010, 10100, 
10101, 10110, 11000, 11010, ...

which would be the sequence of numbers:

4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, ...

Franklin T. Adams-Watters


-----Original Message-----
From: tautocrona at terra.es

----- Original Message -----
From: <franktaw at netscape.net>

>By the way, this sequence should have the "base" keyword.

Actually, I think it shouldn't! The seq doesn't change its members if 
you do the operations in any
other base

________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and 
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.