RE all-base composites

[Tautócrona]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <franktaw at netscape.net>

>Actually, you would even get a different sequence of *numerals*.  For
>example, in base 2,
>you would get the numerals:
>100, 110, 1000, 1001, 1010, 1100, 1110, 1111, 10000, 10010, 10100,
>10101, 10110, 11000, 11010, ...
>which would be the sequence of numbers:
>4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, ...

Yes, you are right again! And if I'm thinking it well (which I doubt by now :P), then the 
base 2 seq is the "fundamental" one because the seq in any other base can be seen as a 
subset of the fundamental (i.e., if the number N is in the seq for a base B, then the 
binary representation of N is in the fundamental seq). I would add the base 2 seq instead 
of the base 10 one, or at least I would contribute both of them! The complementary seq 
1,2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,25... could be nice too.

Jose