Non-mathematical sequences

[cino hilliard]

>From: <ferdiego at cox.net>
>To: cino hilliard <hillcino368 at hotmail.com>, seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
>Subject: RE: Non-mathematical sequences
>Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 9:06:45 -0500
>
>Base is a well renown sequence that it's been published and known for 
>years.
>
>Now, about non-math sequences, they are fewer than you think, since math is 
>everywhere.

Yes. In my opinion 0 is the best approx.

Even the Universe can be explained with equations.

Show me.


>---- cino hilliard <hillcino368 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: franktaw at netscape.net
> > >To: seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
> > >Subject: Non-mathematical sequences
> > >Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:46:43 -0400
> > >
> > >For what it's worth, herewith a list of the sequences I found that are 
>not
> > >mathematical.
> >
> > I still do not know exactly what a base sequence is. Now I do not know 
>what
> > mathematical is. I
> > guess next I will not know what " is" is.
> >
> > Cino
> >
> >
>