Non-mathematical sequences

[zak seidov]

If someone or group of someones
coin any SEQ as  "Non-mathematical"
it well may be so because
"Mathematics is not ready to treat this SEQ yet"
or "This one or this group is not ready...".

In both cases there is no abuse in 
"Non-mathematical" tag...

The greatest example of mutual misunderstanding
well may be opinion of one of greatest physicists
Richard Feynman (in my free exposition):
"Mathematics is not science,
but look love is also not science,
yet both well may be very pleasant".

Yet any contact between high-brow mathmen
and plain mathfans is useful, IMHO. 
Regards, Zak

--- cino hilliard <hillcino368 at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> >From: <ferdiego at cox.net>
> >To: cino hilliard <hillcino368 at hotmail.com>,
> seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
> >Subject: RE: Non-mathematical sequences
> >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 9:06:45 -0500
> >
> >Base is a well renown sequence that it's been
> published and known for 
> >years.
> >
> >Now, about non-math sequences, they are fewer than
> you think, since math is 
> >everywhere.
> 
> Yes. In my opinion 0 is the best approx.
> 
> Even the Universe can be explained with equations.
> 
> Show me.
> 
> 
> >---- cino hilliard <hillcino368 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: franktaw at netscape.net
> > > >To: seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
> > > >Subject: Non-mathematical sequences
> > > >Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:46:43 -0400
> > > >
> > > >For what it's worth, herewith a list of the
> sequences I found that are 
> >not
> > > >mathematical.
> > >
> > > I still do not know exactly what a base sequence
> is. Now I do not know 
> >what
> > > mathematical is. I
> > > guess next I will not know what " is" is.
> > >
> > > Cino
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com