Mean of 10^9 consecutive primes?

[zak seidov]

Neil, Seqfans,

Sure, it's all up to Neil,
accept or not any SEQ*),
but anyone'd admit that 10^6 or 10^9
ain't "large but arbitrary parameter".

Besides, why not to wonder
when we'll know sum of first 10^12 or 10^15 primes,
even the values ain't worth accepting to OEIS.

With regards,
Zak
 
================
That's why I suggested repeatedly
to have file with "received" SEQs
and include in the main database only "accepted" SEQs
(with at least one co-editor's approval).


--- "N. J. A. Sloane" <njas at research.att.com> wrote:

> about Zak's proposal 
> 
> > %N A000001 Arithmetic mean of 1000000 consecutive
> primes.
> 
> - there is a rule, I think a very good one, that
> says that 
> sequences in the OEIS should not depend
> on a large but arbitrary parameter.
> 
> Because, why not also include
> 
> Arithmetic mean of 2006 consecutive primes
> 
> or
> 
> Arithmetic mean of 66666666 consecutive primes
> 
> or
> 
>  Arithmetic mean of 999999999 consecutive primes.
> 
> Neil
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com