Mean of 10^9 consecutive primes?

[ferdiego at cox.net]

It's a free web.  Anyone is free to have his own website and post whatever they want under the law and have his own criteria.

---- zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com> wrote: 
> Neil, Seqfans,
> 
> Sure, it's all up to Neil,
> accept or not any SEQ*),
> but anyone'd admit that 10^6 or 10^9
> ain't "large but arbitrary parameter".
> 
> Besides, why not to wonder
> when we'll know sum of first 10^12 or 10^15 primes,
> even the values ain't worth accepting to OEIS.
> 
> With regards,
> Zak
>  
> ================
> That's why I suggested repeatedly
> to have file with "received" SEQs
> and include in the main database only "accepted" SEQs
> (with at least one co-editor's approval).
> 
> 
> --- "N. J. A. Sloane" <njas at research.att.com> wrote:
> 
> > about Zak's proposal 
> > 
> > > %N A000001 Arithmetic mean of 1000000 consecutive
> > primes.
> > 
> > - there is a rule, I think a very good one, that
> > says that 
> > sequences in the OEIS should not depend
> > on a large but arbitrary parameter.
> > 
> > Because, why not also include
> > 
> > Arithmetic mean of 2006 consecutive primes
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > Arithmetic mean of 66666666 consecutive primes
> > 
> > or
> > 
> >  Arithmetic mean of 999999999 consecutive primes.
> > 
> > Neil
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com