185 is special

[Jon Schoenfield]

Granted ... but couldn't the same objections be made about the existing 
sequence A053169?

Thanks,

-- Jon

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Maximilian Hasler" <maximilian.hasler at gmail.com>
To: "Jon Schoenfield" <jonscho at hiwaay.net>
Cc: "Sequence Fans" <seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr>
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: 185 is special


> On one hand, I believe there are holes in the numbering which might be 
> filled
> in one day, so it's potentially ill defined.
> And, once again, same logical problem: if your sequence is A199999,
> there will be severe conceptual problems starting at least from
> a(199999) on...
> Maximilian
>
> On 6/1/07, Jon Schoenfield <jonscho at hiwaay.net> wrote:
>> Has anyone mentioned the sequence
>> "Positive integers n that do not appear in any of the first n sequences 
>> in
>> OEIS"?