185 is special

[Maximilian Hasler]

On 6/2/07, Jon Schoenfield <jonscho at hiwaay.net> wrote:
> Granted ... but couldn't the same objections be made about the existing
> sequence A053169?

indeed. somehow provocating... and a certain "najs" even extended it
very recently to 100. must be not very serious, that guy...
If this would be done by a script up to 53169 or beyond, the entry
#53169 would disappear and reappear every other update.
Should be classified as "unstable sequence"...

Maximilian

PS: Joshua: of course I meant "cannot exist in the OEIS"...


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maximilian Hasler" <maximilian.hasler at gmail.com>
> To: "Jon Schoenfield" <jonscho at hiwaay.net>
> Cc: "Sequence Fans" <seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr>
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 10:33 AM
> Subject: Re: 185 is special
>
>
> > On one hand, I believe there are holes in the numbering which might be
> > filled in one day, so it's potentially ill defined.
> > And, once again, same logical problem: if your sequence is A199999,
> > there will be severe conceptual problems starting at least from
> > a(199999) on...
> > Maximilian
> >
> > On 6/1/07, Jon Schoenfield <jonscho at hiwaay.net> wrote:
> >> Has anyone mentioned the sequence
> >> "Positive integers n that do not appear in any of the first n sequences
> >> in
> >> OEIS"?
>
>
>