A119560 contains link to malware site (?) Re: A119560 2jbasekzapsumseq[C*B]. (?)

N. J. A. Sloane njas at research.att.com
Mon Mar 26 06:11:19 CEST 2007


see if seq.fan is working, since the OEIS is seemingly down at the 
sequences, really, numerators and denominators) is in the OEIS or not. (A 
straight Google search for the sequence(s) brings up nothing, however.)
Return-Path: <njas at research.att.com>
X-Ids: 164
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:27:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: "N. J. A. Sloane" <njas at research.att.com>
Message-Id: <200703261827.l2QIRSTl1678087 at fry.research.att.com>
To: seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr, se16 at btinternet.com, bowerc at usa.net,
   rayjchandler at sbcglobal.net, pdg at worldofnumbers.com, deutsch at duke.poly.edu,
   seqfan at xyzzy.claranet.de, rkg at cpsc.ucalgary.ca, dean at math.ucdavis.edu,
   Antti.Karttunen at gmail.com, layman at calvin.math.vt.edu, mlb at well.com,
   j.mccranie at adelphia.net, simon.plouffe at sympatico.ca, sellersj at math.psu.edu,
   njas at research.att.com, smiley at math.uaa.alaska.edu,
   somos at grail.cba.csuohio.edu, ralf at ark.in-berlin.de,
   davidwwilson at comcast.net, rgwv at rgwv.com, david at research.att.com, djr at nk.ca,
   rsc at swtch.com, noe at sspectra.com
Subject: OEIS down - machine crashed?
Reply-To: njas at research.att.com
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.164]); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:27:44 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2933/Mon Mar 26 18:26:11 2007 on shiva.jussieu.fr
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 4608109F.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
Return-Path: <ferencadorjan at gmail.com>
X-Ids: 168
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=dpesb/AHajk+DmLVG0JTOGm7N52vCKvopNaIWsAskcdclWWnXM1l3ncguS+m4J9u+kI+xdasmhA3gaLgJhMGruuVS3fX3b47WrqCAjzQ7i0uGbJkqqF8yNmlE2E5zIqQDkEpQ8Zveto/4SEo9w1SnlpIo0ZY3CX2lVHYMoJQHM8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=UnfmBPipRx9TdJqbzyNOIuujiA1dXEMMuydwq4TDjJ/W82xzveKW8vQn2uO+GCWGQtKbK6pufyE5xwhvdJ7GM3fTNutKgPQ7uN1wZkGedYGap062T7YipPBB/kbEA2uCbfDqiVTD1uq5IgxQyXz+sftvIVRd1ycvgIOp3gWkVb0=
Message-ID: <9d67863b0703261329mff97568hd6966d16124dda24 at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:29:22 +0200
From: "Ferenc Adorjan" <fadorjan at freemail.hu>
Sender: ferencadorjan at gmail.com
To: seqfan at ext.jussieu.fr
Subject: Re: Possible Permutations With Mod
In-Reply-To: <d3dac270703251548vee32586q2e1ae97b54e69a53 at mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_220665_4541535.1174940962260"
References: <E1HD0kb-0001fC-00 at pop04.mail.atl.earthlink.net>
	 <9d67863b0703240346s6789bc1bw24becfad681d838 at mail.gmail.com>
	 <d3dac270703250059ha03645eqd5b403ef150604fe at mail.gmail.com>
	 <9d67863b0703251328t31d32fa2r227609d0ef8f4bf0 at mail.gmail.com>
	 <9d67863b0703251332p45b9424co8fdc2c2de0ceb708 at mail.gmail.com>
	 <d3dac270703251548vee32586q2e1ae97b54e69a53 at mail.gmail.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ca45167aa995f8c6
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.168]); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:29:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/2933/Mon Mar 26 18:26:11 2007 on shiva.jussieu.fr
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 46082D23.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!

------=_Part_220665_4541535.1174940962260
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thank you, Max. You are right, due to a small mistake in my pari program,
unintentionally I computed (prime(n) mod n)+1.
Otherwise, it was OK (though not so efficient, as yours!).
Still, the case may be different with the other three sequences, since their
definition is quite different, quasi-recursive. Their plots are also very
different, not showing the nature "cyclic re-trying", like in the
prime-based A125718.

Ferenc

------=_Part_220665_4541535.1174940962260
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thank you, Max. You are right, due to a small mistake in my pari program, unintentionally I computed  (prime(n) mod n)+1.<br>Otherwise, it was OK (though not so efficient, as yours!). <br>Still, the case may be different with the other three sequences, since their definition is quite different, quasi-recursive. Their plots are also very different, not showing the nature "cyclic re-trying", like in the prime-based A125718.
<br><br>Ferenc<br>

------=_Part_220665_4541535.1174940962260--




I don't know what was wrong.

Sorry about this.

Neil





More information about the SeqFan mailing list