A089218 vs A052195

[zak seidov]

Yes, Richard,  
also by my calcs,
A052195 is OK,
so: 
Neil, 
A089218'd be killed,
 
zak

--- Richard Mathar <mathar at strw.leidenuniv.nl> wrote:

> 
> A089218 looks to me like a wrong (because
> incomplete) version of A052195,
> or am I missing some aspect here?
> 
> Richard
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com