mutually-praising pairs

[Rainer Rosenthal]

Joshua Zucker wrote:
> Tanya Khovanova wrote:
>>  Mutually-praising pairs.
>>  130, 230, 430, 530, 630, 730, 1101, 2210, 10110, 11200, 23100
>>
>>  Comment: 1101 and 130 mutually describe each other: If you read 130 as
>>  1 zero, 3 ones, 0 twos; you will get the description of 1101. If you
>>  read 1101 as 1 zero, 1 one, 0 twos and 1 three; you will get the
>>  description of 130.
> 
> Maybe I don't understand the definition - why are for example 12 and
> 110 not mutually praising?  

12 praises 110: one 0 and 2 ones.
But 110 says: one 0, one 1 and no 2.
So 110 praises 10 but not 12.

Cheers,
Rainer



Joshua said:

But maybe we could make the submission page for new sequences help
people out by doing a bit of the "due diligence" for them -- when you
click preview, it could add in some search results to the display at
the top.


Also the reason for almost all duplicates is (1) stupidity
and (2) errors in the terms

What you suggest would not fix either thing!

Neil