[seqfan] Re: LRS formulas for n>=...?

franktaw at netscape.net franktaw at netscape.net
Mon Aug 3 23:48:49 CEST 2009

This strikes me as a bit excessive -- and yet, there is something 

What's missing is the array by antidiagonals: T(n,k) is the number of n 
x k matrices with the specified condition.

I would have added that, the main diagonal sequence, and rows 2 (where 
appropriate, otherwise 3) through 4 (instead of rows 2 or 3 through 10, 
as is present now).

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: rhhardin at att.net

> A163002-A163154 are the same computation without the <=2 adjacent

A163054, that should be.

More information about the SeqFan mailing list