[seqfan] Re: LRS formulas for n>=...?

[rhhardin at att.net]

Alas, you can't enumerate just any old n,m size at will.

You get small n or m solutions much more easily.

--
rhhardin at mindspring.com
rhhardin at att.net (either)
  
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: franktaw at netscape.net
>
> This strikes me as a bit excessive -- and yet, there is something 
> missing.
> 
> What's missing is the array by antidiagonals: T(n,k) is the number of n 
> x k matrices with the specified condition.
> 
> I would have added that, the main diagonal sequence, and rows 2 (where 
> appropriate, otherwise 3) through 4 (instead of rows 2 or 3 through 10, 
> as is present now).
> 
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhhardin at att.net
> 
> > A163002-A163154 are the same computation without the <=2 adjacent
> 
> A163054, that should be.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/