[seqfan] Re: LRS formulas for n>=...?
rhhardin at att.net
rhhardin at att.net
Tue Aug 4 00:35:45 CEST 2009
Alas, you can't enumerate just any old n,m size at will.
You get small n or m solutions much more easily.
--
rhhardin at mindspring.com
rhhardin at att.net (either)
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: franktaw at netscape.net
>
> This strikes me as a bit excessive -- and yet, there is something
> missing.
>
> What's missing is the array by antidiagonals: T(n,k) is the number of n
> x k matrices with the specified condition.
>
> I would have added that, the main diagonal sequence, and rows 2 (where
> appropriate, otherwise 3) through 4 (instead of rows 2 or 3 through 10,
> as is present now).
>
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhhardin at att.net
>
> > A163002-A163154 are the same computation without the <=2 adjacent
>
> A163054, that should be.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list