[seqfan] Re: A004249, A007516
franktaw at netscape.net
franktaw at netscape.net
Wed Jun 10 21:00:27 CEST 2009
I would say that A007516 is clearly erroneous. Compare A014221.
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
-----Original Message-----
From: Leroy Quet <q1qq2qqq3qqqq at yahoo.com>
Are A004249 and A007516 really the same sequence, with an erroneous
number for
a(0) of one of the sequences?
Or is there controversy as to whether a exponent-tower of zero 2's is 0
or 1?
Still, in my opinion, there should be a comment at each sequence at
least
explaining the controversy over the 0th term.
Thanks,
Leroy Quet
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list