[seqfan] Re: Anagrams of triangular numbers

[zak seidov]

Yes, thanks, great!

...My first code was very (shamefully) slow 
so I stopped running it just after "record" "26 anagrams"...

...Idea about considering n-digit  triangular numbers came to me after Bob's message,
and this way is (much) more faster...
(...another example of Olivier's wisdom 
that there is no hurry needed (in sending messages to our list) - numbers were, are and will be forever ;))... 

...I see that your list is full up to 168 anagrams.
Can you submit plz to OEIS your list of minimal T(n) for n = 1..168 (as b-file?)

with first 22 terms being:

0, 120, 4095, 36046, 147153, 219453, 1021735, 1053426, 104653, 10149765, 
10294453, 10348975, 100486576, 10725396, 104379576, 20759346, 12347965, 
101495628, 129548656, 102968425, 104697685, 102925378 (any typos?)

All the best, 
Zak

--- On Sat, 10/17/09, Hans Havermann <pxp at rogers.com> wrote:

> From: Hans Havermann <pxp at rogers.com>
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: Anagrams of triangular numbers
> To: "Sequence Fanatics Discussion list" <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Date: Saturday, October 17, 2009, 2:26 PM
<SKIP>