[seqfan] RE : Re: S and S complementary : cumulative sum is primeaccordingly
Eric Angelini
Eric.Angelini at kntv.be
Wed Jun 30 07:00:01 CEST 2010
You are right, Doug, this ("smallest, etc.")
was implicit (too much implicit!)
Best,
thanks again,
E.
-------- Message d'origine--------
De: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu de la part de Douglas McNeil
Date: mar. 29/06/2010 20:03
À: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
Objet : [seqfan] Re: S and S complementary : cumulative sum is primeaccordingly
> I must prolong S with "the smallest available integer not yet
> present in S and not leading to a contradiction"; can it be 2?
Unless I'm very much mistaken, this restriction isn't in your original
post, so I'm not sure what you're quoting from but I don't think it's
the sequence definition. That's why I asked 'Don't most of these
self-describing sequences have a "minimal term not leading to a
contradiction" rule attached?'
I was surprised not to see such a rule, and originally wondered if
that meant the sequence was unique for some reason.
Doug
--
Department of Earth Sciences
University of Hong Kong
_______________________________________________
Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list