[seqfan] Re: A172043 and many more

[Charles Greathouse]

My favorite part is the redundancy of "n = k, a(k) = foo" rather than
"a(k) = foo".

I suggest deleting those lines.

Charles Greathouse
Analyst/Programmer
Case Western Reserve University

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Klaus Brockhaus
<klaus-brockhaus at t-online.de> wrote:
> %e A172193 For n=0, a(0)=1; n=1, a(1)=37; n=2, a(2)=83; n=3, a(3)=139
> %e A172118 For n=0, a(0)=0; n=1, a(1)=1; n=2, a(2)=45; n=3, a(3)=234
> %e A172117 For n=0, a(0)=0; n=1, a(1)=1; n=2, a(2)=23; n=3, a(3)=86;
> %e A172085 For n=0, a(0)=0; n=1, a(1)=1; n=2, a(2)=41; n=3, a(3)=212
> %e A172082 For n=0, a(0)=0; n=1, a(1)=1; n=2, a(2)=21; n=3, a(3)=78;
> %e A172080 For n=0, a(0)=0, n=1, a(1)=1; n=2, a(2)=37; n=3, a(3)=190
> %e A172078 For n=0, a(0)=0; n=1, a(1)=1; n=2, a(2)=19; n=3, a(3)=70;
> %e A172077 For n=0, a(0)=0; n=1, a(1)=1; n=2, a(2)=33; n=3, a(3)=168
> %e A172076 For n=0, a(0)=0; n=1, a(1)=1; n=2, a(2)=17; n=3, a(3)=62
> %e A172075 For n=0, a(0)=0; n=1, a(1)=1; n=2, a(2)=29; n=3, a(3)=146
> %e A172073 For n=0, a(0)=0; n=1, a(1)=1; n=2, a(2)=15
> %e A172044 For n=0, a(0)=1; n=1, a(1)=17; n=2, a(2)=43; n=3, a(3)=79
> %e A172043 For n=0, a(0)=1; n=1, a(1)=5; n=2, a(2)=19, n=3, a(3)=43
>
>
> The submission page SubmitN.html says
> "*Give example(s) to illustrate the initial terms:".*
> What do above examples illustrate?
> They only repeat what is already presented by the first terms
> combined with the offset.
> They are perhaps not harmful, but useless and annoying.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>