[seqfan] Re: Oh, To Offend (PS)

Robert Munafo mrob27 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 18 05:03:57 CET 2010

Gerasimov didn't even get it right sometimes. For example A020467 said
"Primes that contain digits of nontrivial primes only", which was wrong: 5,
41, 67, 89, and 101 are what he would call "nontrivial primes" and therefore
their digits 0,1,4,5,6,7,8,9 would have to be allowed under his definition.

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:41, N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>wrote:

> [...]
> And calling 2 and 3 "trivial primes" is a very bad idea.
> I wish there was a way to remove comments about
> "trivial primes" from the OEIS.
> I will try to do some editing whenever I see such comments.
> Stepan Gerasimov, please do not add any more comments like that.
> I hope you are a member of the Sequence Fans mailing list.
> If not, you should join, because your name has been mentioned
> a lot lately.
> Neil

 Robert Munafo  --  mrob.com

More information about the SeqFan mailing list