[seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?

[Christopher Gribble]

There may be a little misunderstanding here.
I am not happy with the thought of pecking-order lists either.

Chris Gribble

-----Original Message-----
From: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu]
On Behalf Of Alexander P-sky
Sent: 30 September 2010 11:50 AM
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
Subject: [seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?

I fully agree with Douglas McNeil  and Zak and NOT with Christopher Gribble
and NOT with Andrew Weimholt

I definitely do not like the idea of lists of the "pecking order".

>We are waiting for wiki too long...
So when wiki is coming and how democratic it will be ?

Alexander R. Povolotsky
===========================
On 9/30/10, Christopher Gribble <chris.eveswell at virgin.net> wrote:
> I heartily agree.
>
> Chris Gribble
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu 
> [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu]
> On Behalf Of Andrew Weimholt
> Sent: 30 September 2010 5:44 AM
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?
>
> On 9/29/10, zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Meanwile why Ass.Eds can not discuss (NEW and old) SEQs among 
>> themselves  not bothering the whole list right now - all we need is 
>> the good will and the separate list of AE addresses, right?
>
> I'm not sure what the rest of the list thinks about that, but I for 
> one, enjoy being able to see all of the discussions. I believe it is 
> beneficial for non-AE members such as myself to be aware of the issues 
> and criticisms that the AEs raise regarding various submissions.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>


_______________________________________________

Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/