[seqfan] Fwd: Re: sequence warnings?

Alexander P-sky apovolot at gmail.com
Thu Sep 30 14:55:08 CEST 2010


Hi Chris,

So you agree with the opinion that the creation (within the OEIS
submission process)  of the list of contributors, "whose sequences are
often in error" is not an appropriate idea ?

Alexander R. Povolotsky
===========================
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Christopher Gribble <chris.eveswell at virgin.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:24:50 +0100
Subject: [seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>

There may be a little misunderstanding here.
I am not happy with the thought of pecking-order lists either.

Chris Gribble

-----Original Message-----
From: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu]
On Behalf Of Alexander P-sky
Sent: 30 September 2010 11:50 AM
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
Subject: [seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?

I fully agree with Douglas McNeil  and Zak and NOT with Christopher Gribble
and NOT with Andrew Weimholt

I definitely do not like the idea of lists of the "pecking order".

>We are waiting for wiki too long...
So when wiki is coming and how democratic it will be ?

Alexander R. Povolotsky
===========================
On 9/30/10, Christopher Gribble <chris.eveswell at virgin.net> wrote:
> I heartily agree.
>
> Chris Gribble
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu
> [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu]
> On Behalf Of Andrew Weimholt
> Sent: 30 September 2010 5:44 AM
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?
>
> On 9/29/10, zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Meanwile why Ass.Eds can not discuss (NEW and old) SEQs among
>> themselves  not bothering the whole list right now - all we need is
>> the good will and the separate list of AE addresses, right?
>
> I'm not sure what the rest of the list thinks about that, but I for
> one, enjoy being able to see all of the discussions. I believe it is
> beneficial for non-AE members such as myself to be aware of the issues
> and criticisms that the AEs raise regarding various submissions.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>


_______________________________________________

Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/




_______________________________________________

Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/




More information about the SeqFan mailing list