[seqfan] Re: Fwd: Re: sequence warnings?

[Vladimir Shevelev]

  If to follow to such a bad idea, then one can create of the list of contributors, whose sequences are often non-interesting. I am strongly against of such "black" lists. It is much better to reject some bad
sequences (e.g., non-well defined, quite non-interesting ( i.e. when the definition does not contain a good idea)  etc.)
  On the other hand, in order to avoid the technical  errors, it is better, if every sequence (as, e.g., song) would have two authors: the author of idea and the author of calculation.
 
Regards,
Vladimir


----- Original Message -----
From: Alexander P-sky <apovolot at gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, September 30, 2010 15:32
Subject: [seqfan]  Fwd:  Re: sequence warnings?
To: Christopher Gribble <chris.eveswell at virgin.net>
Cc: seqfan at list.seqfan.eu

> Hi Chris,
> 
> So you agree with the opinion that the creation (within the OEIS
> submission process)  of the list of contributors, "whose 
> sequences are
> often in error" is not an appropriate idea ?
> 
> Alexander R. Povolotsky
> ===========================
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Christopher Gribble <chris.eveswell at virgin.net>
> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:24:50 +0100
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> 
> There may be a little misunderstanding here.
> I am not happy with the thought of pecking-order lists either.
> 
> Chris Gribble
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu [mailto:seqfan-
> bounces at list.seqfan.eu]On Behalf Of Alexander P-sky
> Sent: 30 September 2010 11:50 AM
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?
> 
> I fully agree with Douglas McNeil  and Zak and NOT with 
> Christopher Gribble
> and NOT with Andrew Weimholt
> 
> I definitely do not like the idea of lists of the "pecking order".
> 
> >We are waiting for wiki too long...
> So when wiki is coming and how democratic it will be ?
> 
> Alexander R. Povolotsky
> ===========================
> On 9/30/10, Christopher Gribble <chris.eveswell at virgin.net> wrote:
> > I heartily agree.
> >
> > Chris Gribble
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu
> > [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu]
> > On Behalf Of Andrew Weimholt
> > Sent: 30 September 2010 5:44 AM
> > To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
> > Subject: [seqfan] Re: sequence warnings?
> >
> > On 9/29/10, zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Meanwile why Ass.Eds can not discuss (NEW and old) SEQs among
> >> themselves  not bothering the whole list right now - all 
> we need is
> >> the good will and the separate list of AE addresses, right?
> >
> > I'm not sure what the rest of the list thinks about that, but 
> I for
> > one, enjoy being able to see all of the discussions. I believe 
> it is
> > beneficial for non-AE members such as myself to be aware of 
> the issues
> > and criticisms that the AEs raise regarding various submissions.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> 

 Shevelev Vladimir‎