[seqfan] Re: Dropping the monotonic increase in http://oeis.org/A106003

[israel at math.ubc.ca]

The title of A106003 does not adequately specify the sequence, in my 
opinion. If there is a requirement of monotonic increase, where is it 
mentioned? Please provide more explanation in the Comments section.

Robert Israel
University of British Columbia

On Aug 9 2012, Eric Angelini wrote:

>Hello SeqFans,
>if we require that the next term of the sequence
>is "the smallest integer not yet present in T" 
>do we get this?
>
> T = 
> 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,110,111,100,112,113,114,115,101,102,116,117,120,118,119,130,118,119,140,210,211,150,212,103,213,214,104,121,215,216,160,217,218,170,...
>
>Is T a permutation of http://oeis.org/A001633 ?
>Best,
>É.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>