[seqfan] Re: A104851

N. J. A. Sloane njas at research.att.com
Sun Feb 5 21:44:01 CET 2012


By the way, as long as we are playing with the primes in e,
what about this:

We start with

2.718281828459045235360287471352662497757247093699959574966967627724076630353547594571382\
    1785251664274274663919320030599218174135966290435729003342952605956307381323286279434\
    ...

and chop it up into primes, requiring that each prime be > all
earlier primes. This seems to give
2, 71, 8281828459045235360287471, ...
(done by hand, please check). What's the next term?

This is now A185120.

Neil



More information about the SeqFan mailing list