[seqfan] Re: Can more of these terms be found?

[franktaw at netscape.net]

I think "split" is fine. The alternative here could be added as a 
comment.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Havermann <gladhobo at teksavvy.com>

I agree that "split" suggests a certain ambiguity, though not perhaps 
an
overriding one. The word "separated" might possibly be in a similar 
boat. How
about "deconcatenated"? A more mathematical description could be added 
as a
comment.

On Aug 10, 2013, at 4:41 PM, Allan Wechsler <acwacw at gmail.com> wrote:

> "Numbers whose decimal form can be split into two parts, the square of
> whose difference is the original number." Is that too long? My 
concern is
> the ambiguity of the phrase, "split into two parts".
>
> Or ... "Numbers of the form K 10^n + L, L<10^n, that are equal to 
(K-L)^2."