[seqfan] Re: Sequences in a French Book not Found in OEIS

[Olivier Gerard]

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com> wrote:

> The OEIS has a policy of including published sequences that are wrong. So
> could whoever is entering these sequences
> please make an entry for 0, 0, 0, 1, 20, 65, 350,
> with name "Erroneous version of A000453."
> keyword "dead",
> and give the reference to the book ?
> Thanks!
> Neil
>
>
That's what I did. This is now A228839  with the full book and page
reference.

In fact, there is even another mistake in this page, two lines later
leading to
S2(7,6) = 20 instead of 21  and Bell(7)=876.

Let's remember that this book was published in 1970,
a few years before Neil's Handbook...

Olivier


> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Richard J. Mathar <mathar at mpia-hd.mpg.de
> >wrote:
>
> > In response to
> > http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermail/seqfan/2013-September/011645.html:
> >
> > The sequence 0, 0, 0, 1, 20, 65, 350 of the book is not found in
> > the OEIS because the 20 is a typo and should read 10. (Take row sums
> > to observe that we need a total of 52).
> > The sequence is actually A000453, S2(n,4).
> >
> > The column 1,15,140 is also in the OEIS, A000481. S2(n,5).
> >
>