[seqfan] Re: Sequences do not die

[T. D. Noe]

I'm objecting to comments that say that a sequence dies after X terms.

Tony

At 3:14 PM -0400 4/18/14, franktaw at netscape.net wrote:
>Are you objecting to the "dead" keyword? Otherwise I have no idea what
>you might be getting at.
>
>Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: T. D. Noe <noe at sspectra.com>
>To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
>Sent: Fri, Apr 18, 2014 2:05 pm
>Subject: [seqfan] Sequences do not die
>
>
>Rabbits die, but not sequences.  Sequences end.  Sequences become
>undefined...
>
>Let's be mathematical.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Tony
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/