[seqfan] Re: Sequences do not die

[Charles Greathouse]

A search shows only two such sequences, one of which already has a draft in
progress. I'll take care of both.

Charles Greathouse
Analyst/Programmer
Case Western Reserve University


On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:17 PM, T. D. Noe <noe at sspectra.com> wrote:

> I'm objecting to comments that say that a sequence dies after X terms.
>
> Tony
>
> At 3:14 PM -0400 4/18/14, franktaw at netscape.net wrote:
> >Are you objecting to the "dead" keyword? Otherwise I have no idea what
> >you might be getting at.
> >
> >Franklin T. Adams-Watters
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: T. D. Noe <noe at sspectra.com>
> >To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> >Sent: Fri, Apr 18, 2014 2:05 pm
> >Subject: [seqfan] Sequences do not die
> >
> >
> >Rabbits die, but not sequences.  Sequences end.  Sequences become
> >undefined...
> >
> >Let's be mathematical.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Tony
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >
> >Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >
> >Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>