[seqfan] Re: A236019

[jnthn stdhr]

Least was the word that first came to mind.  In this case, I was mearly
trying to reduce the number of times the word least appeared in the name.

Jonathan
On Jan 18, 2014 1:35 PM, "Kimberling, Clark" <ck6 at evansville.edu> wrote:

> Just a matter of idle curiosity - quite often we see "smallest" instead of
> "least".  Since they refer to the relation named "less than", why is
> "least" not standard?  There's probably a reason for "smaller" - can
> someone explain?  Maybe, somewhere, "<" is called "smaller than"?  (Of
> course, we also see "largest" instead of "greatest", referring to the
> relation > usually called "greater than".)
>
> Thanks,
> Clark
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of jnthn
> stdhr
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 3:09 PM
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
> Subject: [seqfan] A236019
>
> Hi, all.
>
> I am proposing the new sequence A236019, "Smallest number containing at
> least n partitions that contain at least n primes."  The sequence begins:
> 0, 2, 5, 8, 13, 15.
>
> I am currently limited to using a cell phone as my computer.  Would
> someone be interested in extending this sequence?
>
> I have also submitted A235945, "Number of partitions of n containing at
> least one prime.", which fills the gap, so to speak, between A000041,
> "Number of partitions of n." and A000607, "Number of partitions of n into
> prime parts".  This also needs extending.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>