[seqfan] Re: Offsets of Large Integers Decomposed into Decimal Digits

[Frank Adams-Watters]

I don't think so. One still might want to enter a large integer with 
the leading digits, instead of or in addition to entering it with the 
trailing digits.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Mon, Jun 16, 2014 8:59 am
Subject: [seqfan] Re: Offsets of Large Integers Decomposed into Decimal 
Digits


The combination of keywords cons and fini would seem to do the job.


On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Hans Havermann <gladhobo at teksavvy.com>
wrote:

> What if we had a separate (from "cons") keyword for these integer
> digit-decomposition sequences? Or would the combination of "fini" and
> "cons" be already sufficient?
>
> On Jun 16, 2014, at 7:15 AM, M. F. Hasler <oeis at hasler.fr> wrote:
>
> > My personal point of view is that integers should have the "fini" kw
> > and any "decimal expansion" should be c = sum_{i>=offset} a(i) / 
10^i
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>



--
Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, 
NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com

_______________________________________________

Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/