[seqfan] Re: MathJax

jean-paul allouche jean-paul.allouche at imj-prg.fr
Tue Jun 24 20:16:36 CEST 2014


Dear all

Looking at, e.g., MathJax seems a very good solution
(no necesssity for the distant user to load any software,
viewing of LaTeX source if the connection is slow, before
MathJax shows up). Furthermore no necessity for the
site to have any software installed but just a link on the source
of the webpage pointing to an external resource.
I am not sure to see what kind difficulty might occur (but of course
I am not a specialist)

best
jean-paul



Le 24/06/14 18:03, Neil Sloane a écrit :
> We've often talked about this subject in the past.
> But the problems seem impossible to solve.
>
> Besides MathJax, there are several other rival systems (MathML, say)
> which all look good.
>
> The 3 points to remember are:
> 1. Human-readable:  There should be a humanly-readable version of the
>   mathematics
> 2. Searching:   It would be nice if there was a standardized way
> of encoding the math. expressions so that  one can search the OEIS for them
> 3. Displaying in 2-D: It would be nice if the math. expressions were
> displayed in the 2-dimensional display used in journals.
>
> *So we would need 2 or 3 versions for each line of mathematics.*
>
> 1. is much more important than 2. or 3.
>
> - because the OEIS is primarily text-based - that is, almost all the time,
> a user is looking at linear strings.
>
> I don't know that MathJax does a really good job of 3. There
> are a lot of pages on the web that have 2-d math expressions embedded in
> them,
> but they always seem to be too big or too small
> compared to the rest of the text.
>
> Neil
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Charles Greathouse <
> charles.greathouse at case.edu> wrote:
>
>> I would love to have LaTeX formatting here on the OEIS, and MathJax seems
>> the most likely way forward. But that's not likely to happen soon. There's
>> a lot of material on the OEIS already (how would it be handled?) and
>> integrating MathJax into our code would not be all that quick. Also we may
>> want to leave text-accessibility and handling that well is also not
>> entirely straightforward.
>>
>> So one day surely, but not today.
>>
>> Charles Greathouse
>> Analyst/Programmer
>> Case Western Reserve University
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:10 PM, John W. Nicholson <reddwarf2956 at yahoo.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am wondering if MathJax might be used in the future of the OEIS?
>>>
>>>
>>> You can render LaTeX mathematical expressions using MathJax, as on
>>> math.stackexchange.com:
>>>
>>> John W. Nicholson
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
>
>




More information about the SeqFan mailing list