[seqfan] Re: 1951-numbers

[Olivier Gerard]

May I recall to all members that such long lists are unnecessary,
even detrimental in a seqfan post ?

Just quote enough numbers, and give a link to a place where the full
content is
accessible. If necessary, submit a b-file or a new sequence,  or send the
complete
data off-list only to those interested.

Regards,

Olivier


On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Lars Blomberg <larsl.blomberg at comhem.se>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I find the first 1000 terms to be:
> 11, 16, 17, 27, 47, 52, 57, 78, 87, 117,

[...]


> /Lars B
>
>