[seqfan] Re: 1951-numbers

[Lars Blomberg]

Olivier,

I am sorry, I was not aware of the restriction, but can fully understand the reasons.
Will not happen again.

/Lars B

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] För Olivier Gerard
Skickat: den 22 december 2015 13:47
Till: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Ämne: [seqfan] Re: 1951-numbers

May I recall to all members that such long lists are unnecessary, even detrimental in a seqfan post ?

Just quote enough numbers, and give a link to a place where the full content is accessible. If necessary, submit a b-file or a new sequence,  or send the complete data off-list only to those interested.

Regards,

Olivier


On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Lars Blomberg <larsl.blomberg at comhem.se>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I find the first 1000 terms to be:
> 11, 16, 17, 27, 47, 52, 57, 78, 87, 117,

[...]


> /Lars B
>
>

_______________________________________________

Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/