[seqfan] Re: A133579

[Frank Adams-Watters]

The definition is clearly wrong, since gcd(n,a(n-1)) always divides 
a(n-1).

A133580 seems to be related, and may provide a clue. (BTW, the offset 
for A133580 is wrong; from the definition it should be 0.)

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Harvey P. Dale <hpd at hpdale.org>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Fri, Feb 13, 2015 6:59 pm
Subject: [seqfan] A133579


	I cannot figure out how to generate the terms of the above sequence 
from its
definition.
	Best,
	Harvey

_______________________________________________

Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/