[seqfan] Re: A089755

[Frank Adams-Watters]

I think I've figured out A089755. It looks like the sequence is computed using leading zeros, with the requirement that terms be at least two digits. So 13 can't be followed by 3, not two digits; but 103 is followed by 3 which is "really" 03, and hence legal. Dropping the leading digit from 03 leaves 3, which must thus start the next term.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Thu, Sep 17, 2015 11:00 pm
Subject: [seqfan] Re: A089755


Yes, OK, I agree. So how about submitting your corrected version as a
new
sequence, and then
we can flag the original version as an erroneous version
of A_new, and give
it keyword dead

Bob Wilson just sent an email as I was
typing this. Bob, can you rescue the
original version?
Well, in any case, we
need Franklin's better version to be in the OEIS


Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A.
Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ
08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University,
Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email:
njasloane at gmail.com


On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Frank Adams-Watters
<franktaw at netscape.net
> wrote:

> Maybe; but in fact the values in the database
include single-digit values
> - just not in the first place they could go.
That's the problem.
>
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>
> To: Sequence Fanatics
Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Sent: Thu, Sep 17, 2015 10:47 pm
>
Subject: [seqfan] Re: A089755
>
>
> Let's not be hasty. I think the intention is
that each term should have at
> least
> two digits. Let's try to make some small
adjustments to the
> definition so that
> it matches the terms.
>
>
> That's
always been the OEIS policy: when in doubt,
> preserve the sequence
> itself
.
>
>
> Can you please submit your version as a new
> sequence, and
> give
cross-references linking them?
>
> Best regards
> Neil
>
> Neil J. A.
> Sloane,
President, OEIS Foundation.
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ
>
08904, USA.
> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University,
>
Piscataway, NJ.
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
>
Email:
> njasloane at gmail.com
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Frank
Adams-Watters
> <franktaw at netscape.net
> > wrote:
>
> > This sequence does not
match its definition
> (see
> > https://oeis.org/draft/A089755). There is no
definition I can see that
> it
> > does follow - it appears to have been
miscalculated by hand. What should
> we
> > do with it?
> >
> > Franklin T.
Adams-Watters
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> >
> >
Seqfan Mailing list -
> http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan
> Mailing list -
http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list -
http://list.seqfan.eu/
>

_______________________________________________

Seqfan
Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/