[seqfan] Re: Observation on the parity of A171791 and A233312

[Vladimir Shevelev]

Dear Jörgen,

Neither before no after Dec 2013, when
I submitted A233249 in which I introduced
the c-equivalence of the positive numbers,
I did not hear about this notion and did
not use it in any my paper.  
Maybe, anyone knows something about 
this or equivalent term?

Thanks,
Vladimir

________________________________________
From: SeqFan [seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] on behalf of Jorgen Backelin [joeb at math.su.se]
Sent: 16 January 2016 16:47
To: seqfan at list.seqfan.eu
Subject: [seqfan] Re: Observation on the parity of A171791 and A233312

Dear Vladimir,

OK; I've now started a submission (at the preliminarily allocated item number
A267508. It may take me some days to get it fit for actual submission.

One question: Is the term "c-equivalence" only used in some OEIS items, or
dies it exist also in some published text, or e.g. in some arXiv article?
Do you know if anyone else has employed another term for this concept?
I think that it is possible that someone used "c-equivalence" in some
other sense, if it is not an established term. (Of course, I could
always write "c-equivalence in the sense of Shevelev", if you yourself
didn't use this term in any other sense.)

Jצrgen