[seqfan] Re: Publication year of n-th revision of ISO/IEC 14882

[Felix Fröhlich]

Okay, I agree.
Thanks for the reply.

Best regards
Felix

2016-11-29 0:46 GMT+01:00 Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>:

> Even though Bjarne and I were colleagues for many years, I don't think this
> is appropriate for the OEIS!
>
> (For one thing, we would have to do the same thing for all the other
> languages, and we would need to
> hire someone to keep up with all the revisions of all the languages.  Also
> calendar years cause trouble, also would we document every change to the
> Mac OS ? But basically I don't think these sequences are appropriate for
> us.)
>
> Best regards
> Neil
>
> Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> Email: njasloane at gmail.com
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Felix Fröhlich <felix.froe at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear SeqFans,
> >
> > a(n) gives the publication year of the n-th revision of ISO/IEC Standard
> > 14882, defining the C++ programming language. The sequence starts 1998,
> > 2003, 2011, 2014, corresponding to what is informally known as C++98,
> > C++03, C++11 and C++14, respectively.
> >
> > Some links
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B#Standardization
> > http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=25845
> > http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=38110
> > http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=50372
> > http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=64029
> >
> > Probably a poor idea for an OEIS sequence, I know.
> > What do others think?
> >
> > Best regards
> > Felix Fröhlich
> >
> > --
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>