[seqfan] Re: changes to A163777

[P. Michael Hutchins]

Sounds good Joerg.

I only realized today that all the things I tried to do, which were all
rejected by Editors
(excepyt for fixing a couple of errors)
you can do without fear of contradiction.

A better process would've saved me many days of work (not of any vale, I
guess) and untold frustration.

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Joerg Arndt <arndt at jjj.de> wrote:

> I gave new names to those three:
>
> https://oeis.org/A163777
>   Even terms in A054639.
>
> https://oeis.org/A163778
>   Odd terms in A054639.
>
> https://oeis.org/A163779
>   Numbers k of the form 4*j + 1 such that 2*k + 1 is a prime with
> primitive root 2.
>
> I support the deletion of the "Archimedes' spiral" spiral comments.
> Nothing id lost by doing that, because the papers by Asveld contain
> everything (and much better words).
>
> I'll start the edits now.
>
> @ P. Michael Hutchins: DON'T TOUCH THESE EDITS!
>
> Best regards,   jj
>
>
>
> * Андрей Заболотский via SeqFan <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu> [Mar 21. 2018
> 11:30]:
> > I'd suggest following the advice of MFH, who is an Editor-in-Chief
> (unlike me and Omar), and delete the "Archimedean spiral" part completely
> (but don't split the paragraph with your signature; just put it at the end
> of the paragraph). Your explanation from your next-to-last message looks
> rather clear, especially when compared to the existing one.
> >
> > A side remark: if you need to contact an editor personally, you can go
> to his/her OEIS wiki user page and use the "Email this user" link on the
> left (it only appears if you are logged in to the OEIS wiki).
> >
> > Thank you for making the OEIS better.
> >
> >
> > BR,
> > AZ
> >
> > Вторник, 20 марта 2018, 17:37 +03:00 от P. Michael Hutchins <
> pmh232 at gmail.com >:
> > >from wiki email:
> > >
> > >Andrey Zabolotskiy commented on your changes to A163777:
> > >>     Perhaps it can be formulated in the terms of the "inside-out
> > >> permutation", as in A294673?
> > >
> > >
> > >Thank you, Andrey.
> > >
> > >No doubt it could be formulated in terms of the "inside-out
> permutation" -
> > >in fact, a study of the relationships among all the similar Shuffle
> > >permutations could be uselul - but I was restricting myself to improving
> > >the articulation of what he was trying to say.
> > >
> > >
> > >Best regards,
> > >
> > >  -- Michael
> > >
> > >On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Online Encyclopedia of Integer
> Sequences <
> > >wiki-noreply at oeis.org > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dear P. Michael Hutchins:
> > >>
> > >> Andrey Zabolotskiy commented on your changes to A163777:
> > >>
> > >>     Perhaps it can be formulated in the terms of the "inside-out
> > >> permutation", as in A294673?
> > >>
> > >> Visit  http://oeis.org/draft/A163777 for the latest revision of
> A163777.
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >>    -- The OEIS Wiki
> > >>
> > >> P. S. REPLIES TO THIS EMAIL WILL BE DISCARDED.
> > >> To reply, please visit the sequence page:
> > >>  http://oeis.org/draft/A163777
> > >>
> > >
> > >--
> > >Seqfan Mailing list -  http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
> >
> > --
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>