[seqfan] Re: Prime numbers that differ by 30 with no primes between p and p+30

[W. Edwin Clark]

And... based on your data: Here are the only two quadruples of successive
primes of the
form [p,p+30,p+60,p+90] up through the 100,000th prime:
  [642427, 642457, 642487, 642517]
  [1058861, 1058891, 1058921, 1058951]

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 7:27 PM Harvey P. Dale <hpd at hpdale.org> wrote:

> Chris:
>
>             You are correct that 69623 is the smallest prime such that its
> immediate predecessor prime and its immediate successor prime are both
> separated from it by 30. Here are the next such primes up through the
> 100,000th prime: 110681, 134639, 228677, 237821, 250919, 303187, 318949,
> 396479, 421943, 498301, 507461, 535273, 554347, 629653, 642457, 642487,
> 668273, 692191, 716033, 729821, 780553, 782611, 790927, 801247, 825161,
> 829319, 847423, 892321, 902903, 940127, 942479, 963943, 995273, 1027097,
> 1058891, 1058921, 1063273, 1072763, 1080383, 1090303, 1118599, 1123777,
> 1176323, 1193399, 1213981, 1234657.
>
>             That sequence does not appear in the OEIS. Is it of sufficient
> interest?
>            Best,
>            Harvey
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SeqFan <seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu> On Behalf Of Chris Thompson
> Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 12:43 PM
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: Prime numbers that differ by 30 with no primes
> between p and p+30
>
>
>
> I was motivated by David Seal's posting to wonder what the situation was
> for a similar but much better known series, namely prime pairs.
>
>
>
>   A001359 is the lesser of each pair, primes p such that p+2 is also prime
>
>   A006512 is the greater of each pair, primes p such hat p-2 is also prime
>
>   A001097 is their union as a set, with 5 occurring once
>
>   A077800 is their union as a multiset, with 5 occurring twice
>
>
>
> It is probably not desirable that every sequence involving pairs should
> have all four versions in OEIS, though!
>
>
>
> The union version for (p,p+30) being consecutive primes would face the
> same problem as for 5 with the prime pairs: should the p such that
>
> (p-30,p,p+30) are consecutive primes, occur once or twice? [The smallest
> such p is 69623, and there are undoubtedly infinitely many of them.]
>
>
>
> --
>
> Chris Thompson
>
> Email: cet1 at cam.ac.uk<mailto:cet1 at cam.ac.uk>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Seqfan Mailing list -
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__list.seqfan.eu_&d=DwIGaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=XiYos0f3ggKs3-anzJfncQ&m=ipYPiTMW-aJ0bqVytJ3Ki_LdfccfsilTeqxVVBz1okE&s=-Xr7gGi47_LZ4Cn6wLvRxhdPQ79hjIZNrkKYqNzyauA&e=
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>