[seqfan] Re: Numbers expressed in non-decimal bases

[Antti Karttunen]

On 2/10/21, Pierre Abbat <phma at bezitopo.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 10:32:42 AM EST israel at math.ubc.ca wrote:
>> Yes, there are quite a few sequences of that type, e.g. A007089 and
>> A001738.
>
> Those aren't what I'm asking about. I'm talking about sequences like
> A004558,
> which is √5 in base 5, although there's nothing about the computation of √5
> that makes it easier or more sensible in base 5.

Maybe
https://oeis.org/A048708
is more what you were after?
(It's A048707 converted to hexadecimal. Fortunately, no digits larger
than 9 were needed.)

I would say, go ahead with base-3 variant, but please submit also a
normal "decimal" version.


Best,

Antti

>
> Pierre
>
> --
> The Black Garden on the Mountain is not on the Black Mountain.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>