[seqfan] Re: A168233(0)

[Frank Adams-watters]

The generating functions (in the formulas section) also change.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters


-----Original Message-----
From: Allan Wechsler <acwacw at gmail.com>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Mon, Mar 29, 2021 8:51 pm
Subject: [seqfan] A168233(0)

Can anyone think of a good reason not to extend A168233 so that the 0th
entry is 1? As far as I can tell, the only changes that would need to be
made would be to amend the data, the B-file, and the offset. I *think* all
the statements in the comments are still true but I would appreciate
another set of eyes.

--
Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/