[seqfan] Re: Reproducing A064690 (sign changes of a rational fraction iteration)

Hugo Pfoertner yae9911 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 23 09:24:55 CEST 2023


My results beyond 10^6 remain stable also with \p 20000 and \p 50000, but
it would be good if someone could independently verify this.

On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 8:20 AM Lucas Brown <lucasbrown.cit at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Using Python's gmpy2.mpfr data type with 10,000,000 bits, I checked up to
> 60,000 and got the same results as Hugo Pfoertner.
>
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 10:17 PM Hugo Pfoertner <yae9911 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, forgot to delete one of the progress markers, "-111", from the
> list
> > for n>10^6
> >
> > --
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>


More information about the SeqFan mailing list